tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6879915515880887788.post2480775970312123085..comments2010-01-26T12:25:02.239-05:00John M. Muellerhttps://profiles.google.com/112664410285566368332noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6879915515880887788.post-14316485392390674232010-01-26T12:25:02.239-05:002010-01-26T12:25:02.239-05:00Re: Clark --- yep, that would have been a nice risk to take (i.e. going for it in 2 on the 18th).<br /><br />Re: Campbell --- if only he didn&#39;t have that first round. he was getting better as the tournament went on.Johnny Momo Muellerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01518330482010663614noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6879915515880887788.post-8742327933724856952010-01-26T09:59:03.582-05:002010-01-26T09:59:03.582-05:00Wow where was Campbell?<br /><br />If only Clark would have gone for it in two on the 18th...<br /><br />HarveyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6879915515880887788.post-76677236079538142232010-01-24T04:45:36.643-05:002010-01-24T04:45:36.643-05:00Campbell seemed like a good pick. He likes this tournament. Not sure what happened to him in the first round with his 79. Maybe the LaQuinta course jumped up and bit him, like it did to some other pros. Once you have a poor round at the Hope, it is tough to get back into the mix of things. His 64 in the 3rd round helped.Johnny Momo Muellerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01518330482010663614noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6879915515880887788.post-38020307838734402842010-01-21T13:33:17.561-05:002010-01-21T13:33:17.561-05:00John,<br /><br />A little late to make picks, but I would have taken Campbell, Clark, Rose, Leonard, and Weir. Campbell appears to be struggling based on the first round.<br /><br />BaummerAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6879915515880887788.post-79496633536097114572010-01-19T17:52:25.732-05:002010-01-19T17:52:25.732-05:00Hey John,<br /><br />I will take Campbell, Weir, Moore, Laird and Rose.<br /><br />HarveyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com